Justin Sane live
Justin Sane live
News Stories

The aftermath of ANTI-FLAG: a dissolution of ideals amid allegations against Justin Sane – the band issues statement

5 mins read

In the cobwebbed corridors of the punk rock landscape, there’s often an unspoken agreement that the genre serves as both escapism and confrontation—a place to raise fists against societal dissonance and to seek refuge from it. But when a cornerstone of the subculture comes crumbling down, lacerated by the very ethics it ostensibly upheld, it becomes incumbent on us to navigate the wreckage thoughtfully. Such is the complex tangle of emotions and actions we find ourselves wading through in the aftermath of allegations against Justin Sane, the erstwhile frontman of the political punk band Anti-Flag.

Anti-Flag has been a stalwart emblem of left-leaning punk ethos for more than three decades. They were a sonic weapon against complacency, lobbing volleys of chords and lyrics that sought to unhinge the status quo. But in mid-July of this year, that socio-political narrative began to unravel when allegations of sexual misconduct surfaced against Sane. The seismic charges set off by the claims, which have since swelled in number, led to the band’s dissolution, a move that came with both urgency and a grim, retrospective clarity.

The initial spark that ignited this disturbing series of revelations was an anonymous woman’s allegation on a podcast, later confirmed to be Kristina Sarhadi, a New York-based holistic therapist and health coach. In the wake of her claims, twelve more women, with stories that span from the 1990s to 2020, came forward in an incisive report by Rolling Stone, leading Sane’s former bandmates—Pat Thetic, Chris Barker (aka ‘Chris 2’), and Chris Head—to issue a joint statement condemning their former colleague.

Anti-Flag's Justin Sane releases statement

While the details are damning—and we do not seek to downplay the gravity of these allegations—what lends an additional layer of sorrow to this ordeal is the sheer betrayal that resonates in the band’s collective statement. These are men who considered themselves comrades in a movement and friends in life. They stood shoulder to shoulder with Sane, under a banner of progressive ideals and social justice, only to discover that their own tenets were allegedly weaponized in the most manipulative of ways by someone they trusted implicitly.

The band’s expression of their feeling of betrayal is matched only by their acknowledgement of the survivors, thanking them for their courage and emphasizing their own long-standing belief in the voices of victims. They remind us that abuse can take refuge in the most unexpected quarters, using the same ideological trappings that are intended to provide sanctuary from such darkness. This observation drives home the point that the architecture of belief and trust can often serve as the scaffolding for deceit.

Perhaps what is most heartrending in this maelstrom of disillusionment is the story of Chris Barker, who has himself been a survivor of sexual abuse. Sharing the stage for years with someone now accused of such egregious activities forces us to ponder the vast complexities of human behavior—that a person can be a pillar in one part of your life while simultaneously undermining the very foundations of trust and decency.

So where does this leave us—fans, observers, and former collaborators alike? Can the ideological mission of Anti-Flag outlive the disgrace of one of its architects? Should it? These questions, like the chords of a song left unfinished, hang in the air. The collective statement ends with a palpable sense of uncertainty, a void filled with more questions than answers.

What we can conclude, if anything, is that this episode lays bare the urgent need for transparency, reflection, and a continuous questioning of the spaces we consider safe. As we sift through the pieces, the one glaring constant remains: that survivors be heard, supported, and believed, even as the reverberations of their revelations shake the very bedrock of communities we thought impervious to such internal collapses.

Here’s the full statement by the band:


“In light of the recent article in Rolling Stone magazine, to Kristina, Jenn, Molly, Rebecca, Suzanne, Mat, Susie, Stefanie, Karina, Ella, Elizabeth, Hannah, and Tali, we would like to say thank you for your courage in sharing the pain you have experienced. And, to others who may yet come forward, while you don’t owe anyone your story, please know that you are not alone and that we believe you.

To Justin, we believe you are very sick and in need of serious professional help. We want to have compassion and have faith in restorative justice, but fuck you for hurting so many people, not just the ones who have bravely come forward, but anyone still carrying their pain internally. Fuck you for exploiting the work of the band and the many people associated with it for so long. As many predators do, it appears you used our beliefs as a cover for egregious activities that you clearly knew we would never condone.

To everyone, we collectively and individually still have far more questions than answers in this moment. We have been learning of and processing all of this information in real-time. We trusted Justin greatly and are now learning that we were deceived, lied to, and kept in the dark for the entirety of our association. For Chris Barker, personally, Justin knew his history with trauma: his father has been convicted of sexual abuse of children and is currently incarcerated, his sister was a victim of abuse, and Chris himself was sexually abused by an older child in their neighborhood. We share this to demonstrate that Justin was acutely aware of the visceral reaction we would have to such destructive behavior. But also because sharing a stage for so long with someone you later learn is an accused predator has been incredibly painful to process and come to terms with. Two things can be true: a person can be kind and selfless in one space and a monster in another.

Around 10:30PM on July 18th, we were alerted that a podcast would be released the next morning detailing a sexual assault involving Justin. We forwarded a message to him that previewed the episode and contained a photo and name. Justin responded that he did not know this person. The next morning, when the three of us heard Kristina’s story, it became apparent to us that he was lying. To be true to the values we embraced for decades, we quit the band immediately and without hesitation. The three of us removed the band’s internet presence in an attempt to limit spaces for people to attack, antagonize, or harm Kristina as we tried to get a grasp on this shocking information.

As more details have been shared since the release of the podcast, we have been waiting for Justin to do the right thing. Given his lack of contrition in any meaningful way, it is very clear that he is absolutely not the person we were led to believe him to be.

We are unsure where our path will lead us. Right now, words feel hollow and no statement can alleviate the suffering that has been caused. We have a great deal to learn about ourselves – with much soul-searching and introspection ahead. There will have to be a lot of therapy and devotion of time and resources to places that are equipped to help with these kinds of traumas. The three of us are still in shock and grieving, but mostly our hearts are broken for every victim. We are deeply saddened by every one of your painful stories, and will forever be grateful for your courage in sharing them.

Love, healing, and justice to all survivors.
Pat, Chris, and Chris”

If you or someone you know is a victim of sexual abuse, here are some organizations that are dedicated to providing assistance.

Previous Story

The fall of a punk-rock idealist: Justin Sane of ANTI-FLAG faces damning allegations

Next Story

A look back at ENVY’s “Insomniac Doze”: a modern classic in the landscape of post hardcore, celebrating its 17th anniversary today